Recent Pals Archives are Yourchives Read All about Me Look out, it's evil! Previous Previous Next Next
Look out, it’s evil! - Bugger the Duggars (Scary Fundies Mark I)
Helping to drag America, kicking & screaming, into the Age of Enlightenment
6_bleen_7
[info]6_bleen_7
Add to Memories
Tell a Friend
Bugger the Duggars (Scary Fundies Mark I)
Edit: Comments have been re-enabled. I'm curious how people are finding this post.

Most people have heard of the infamous Duggar family, whose fecundity has lately made them the darling of the media, and a total nightmare for anyone who feels any sense of ecological responsibility.

In case you haven't, they have fifteen—count 'em, fifteen—children, with a sixteenth on the way. (May I never again find cause to type "sixteenth on the way." My entire left cerebral hemisphere has painful seizures every time I even think about it.) While the family's entire Web site is an ironclad case for the idea of mandatory breeding licenses, what really ticks me off is the religious fanaticism. I expect, or at least hope, that sane, responsible Christians feel the same way.

Take a look—if you dare—at their favorite Web sites. When anyone who mentions God and Jesus at least five times in every sentence about "home-schooling," you know that they're using the term as a euphemism for a method of persuasion whose name begins with a "b" and ends with "rainwashing." And it goes without saying that the most prominently displayed link is to an electronic travesty, an affront to 0s and 1s everywhere, called Creation Science Evangelism. Look at this crock of shit—I take it back; this abomination transcends the concepts of both crock and shit. I will restate: Look at this double hogshead of tapeworm-ridden hemorrhagic sewage and pray—yes, literally, pray—that we never see this drivel taught in our public schools. (Doesn't the juxtaposition of the words science and evangelism set off warning bells?)

I rant about the Duggars not for their beliefs per se, but because they insist they have the right to force their medieval view of Nature on the rest of us Americans, while simultaneously feeling entitled to the benefits of the very science that they decry.

(Now I really don't blame the children, who, after all, didn't ask to be born to a couple of nitwits who clearly suffer from a psychological condition whose name begins with "schizophreni" and—you get the idea. Anyone care to take bets on how many of these poor kids will wind up in therapy by the time they're nineteen? Assuming they don't each have four children of their own by that age, in which case therapy can't help them.)

Mr. and Mrs. Duggar don't seem all that surprised that every one of their far, far too many children has lived a more or less healthy life so far. If they had lived 250 years ago, the Duggars would have considered themselves very lucky if as many as 10 of their 16 children survived to the age where they would become productive members of the family, and perhaps luckier still that they had both lived to the ripe old age of 40, having successfully dodged smallpox, cholera, plague, appendicitis, infected cuts, and a host of other highly lethal situations, including—and especially—childbirth.

But they don't have to feel lucky, because within the last couple of centuries, more than forty years have been added to the human lifespan (in industrialized countries), and we enjoy a higher standard of living than has ever been seen before. What has brought about all these changes for the infinitely better? Religion? Good Lord, no! It was science, performed by the rules of science: the exact same set of scientific principles that has given us the theory of evolution by natural selection and a geologic record that places the age of the Earth at about 4.6 billion years.

With this in mind, here's my proposal: anyone who wants to lobby, publicly, in favor of abandoning modern biology, should agree to forfeit all the benefits that modern biology has provided us. It's only fair. Isn't it? Is my logic sound here?

What, you need insulin? Sorry, you can't have Humulin (recombinant human insulin), because it could only have been developed as an outgrowth of recombinant DNA technology—which has sprung directly from modern evolutionary theory! Here's 50 pounds of pig and cow pancreases: your job is to extract your insulin from these, just like they did in the olden days. By the way, you'll have to do the same thing again tomorrow, and every day after that. Better get cracking—you can't live without the stuff forever! And better hope you don't become allergic to it—you'll be SOL if you do.

Yep, these wackos may suddenly change their tune if we cut off their modern medicine. No recombinant insulin, no antidepressants, none of the new antibiotics we desperately need because the germs have evolved resistance to all the old ones, and definitely—definitely—no biochemical fertility treatments.

My God protect you and grant you a long, healthy life!

Tags: , , ,
Mood: ullllllll...
Current Tunes: Bolling, Suite for Flute and Jazz Piano

Comments
deadrelatives From: [info]deadrelatives Date: August 6th, 2005 08:41 am (UTC) (Link)
my favorite link from their site:

Wholesome Wear

heheh
6_bleen_7 From: [info]6_bleen_7 Date: August 6th, 2005 09:18 pm (UTC) (Link)
I looked at that one, too. God forbid that a woman might actually show her knees while swimming in the Waikiki surf when it was 90 °F and 95% humidity! And those stupid historians say that the Roman Empire was the height of human decadence.
deadrelatives From: [info]deadrelatives Date: August 6th, 2005 09:41 pm (UTC) (Link)
hehe..so true.
jimcarson From: [info]jimcarson Date: August 6th, 2005 03:33 pm (UTC) (Link)

What Would Darwin Do?

The sadly ironic evolutionary aspect of this is they are the ones who are breeding.
6_bleen_7 From: [info]6_bleen_7 Date: August 6th, 2005 09:22 pm (UTC) (Link)

Re: What Would Darwin Do?

I console myself in the belief that good sense is cultural rather than genetic. For this I have some modest justification, mostly from observation that a good number of the level-headed people I know are descended from medieval Europeans. (Of course, frantic breeding was necessary in those bad old days just to keep the population stable, so maybe the hypothesis isn't all that good after all, sigh.)
chillyrodent From: [info]chillyrodent Date: August 6th, 2005 03:35 pm (UTC) (Link)

I can't link to their website.

No, I mean, I have the technology, but not the intestinal fortitude.

By the way, I thought this was a link to an actually-published editorial. That was very funny. You make geeks everywhere proud.
6_bleen_7 From: [info]6_bleen_7 Date: August 6th, 2005 09:15 pm (UTC) (Link)

Re: I can't link to their website.

Aw, gosh, thanks!
cutiepi314 From: [info]cutiepi314 Date: August 7th, 2005 07:43 am (UTC) (Link)
Bum buh buh buh buh buh... you know the lyrics, sing along with me!!!
silver_mage From: [info]silver_mage Date: February 3rd, 2006 05:25 pm (UTC) (Link)
I know it's late commenting to this, but I've been looking for this rant to bookmark. I do believe I'm in love, this is the BEST I've read in a long time on this topic.
6_bleen_7 From: [info]6_bleen_7 Date: February 3rd, 2006 06:08 pm (UTC) (Link)
Aw, gosh, thanks! And welcome!
From: [info]bigdumbchimp Date: August 14th, 2006 05:00 pm (UTC) (Link)

damn

You have to feel sorry for the life of miserably crushing ignorance they will have to deal with.
arensb From: [info]arensb Date: August 15th, 2006 07:01 pm (UTC) (Link)
Yep, these whackos may suddenly change their tune if we cut off their modern medicine. No recombinant insulin, no antidepressants, none of the new antibiotics we desperately need because the germs have evolved resistance to all the old ones, and definitely—definitely—no biochemical fertility treatments.

This seems to combine elements of health care overhaul and faith-based initiatives. The Bush administration'll love it!
6_bleen_7 From: [info]6_bleen_7 Date: August 15th, 2006 07:13 pm (UTC) (Link)
Heh-heh—except for the fertility treatments, perhaps. Gotta increase that tax base!
jigglypuff From: [info]jigglypuff Date: October 12th, 2007 05:44 am (UTC) (Link)
This is so late, but I love this. Thank you so much. xD Also, they have seventeen as of August 2. I just... oh my god. My reproductive system wept.
jigglypuff From: [info]jigglypuff Date: October 12th, 2007 05:45 am (UTC) (Link)
Also, that last sentence -- 'reproductive system' is used with sarcasm there XD
6_bleen_7 From: [info]6_bleen_7 Date: October 20th, 2007 03:02 am (UTC) (Link)
Thanks! I recently heard about No. 17. SIGH. I'm just waiting for Mrs. Duggar to have one kid with a major neural tube defect. That'll plug the dike mighty quick.
From: (Anonymous) Date: January 25th, 2009 09:20 pm (UTC) (Link)

Duggars

*shakes head*
I found you while searching images on google.
I saw the tv guide listing for their show "17 & counting" & learned they'd just had #18 in December 2008. I wanted to see if this was the same family I had laughed at in the "Vagina: its not a clown car" pictures I've seen floating around for a while. http://images.wikia.com/wikiality/images/1/16/DuggarVagina.jpg
6_bleen_7 From: [info]6_bleen_7 Date: January 28th, 2009 03:01 am (UTC) (Link)
Welcome! Yes, it is indeed the same family; in fact, the portrait used for the Clown Car poster is the same one that I used. And that was back when #16 was still brand fresh.
thatdamnninja From: [info]thatdamnninja Date: February 3rd, 2009 08:27 am (UTC) (Link)

I found you via looking up 'too many kids' on Google and noticed that it was the same family as the VAGINA picture and wanted to see what was up with all the skulls.

Kudos to you!
19 people said howdyTalk to me!
Profile
Prof. Bleen
User: [info]6_bleen_7
Name: Prof. Bleen
Calendar
Back July 2009
1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031
Phun Sites
Counter
Site Meter
Tags